|
Contributed by: Ms.V. Nandini, Graduate Student,
Materials Science & Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA
E-mail: nandu.raman@gmail.com
I read with considerable interest the study made by Nandini Voice For The Deprived on State of Engineering Education in Tamil Nadu. The findings of the study can be seen in nandinivoice.org
Being a fairly recent Chemical Engineering graduate from an average-quality institution and having had two very different academic experiences in India and the US, I feel that I have a fairly good vantage point to comment on the situation.
Several points that are made in the study strike a chord with me.
I consider my experience as a chemical engineering student in Central Electro Chemical Research Institute (CECRI) at Karaikudi in Tamil Nadu to be fairly representative of other engineering graduates in Tamil Nadu.
I was only able to assess the quality of education I had received in CECRI, when I came to the US and struggled in my first semester. Engineering education in India is a lot more qualitative than it should be, with inadequate emphasis on numerical ability! The knowledge level, thinking ability and creativity of many of the teachers is so poor that they are able to add very little value to their students.
To add to the problem, few teachers update themselves and still use outdated textbooks from the 1970s for their classes. My first revelation on this aspect came when I took thermodynamics, a very important subject to most engineers, in my first semester in USA and realized that I had to completely re learn many basic concepts!
Quality of students
The problem is compounded by the quality of students that come into these colleges and their interest levels. Institutes like IITs take great care in the quality of students they select and hence produce good engineers. Other institutions select the “second-tier” students and produce mediocre engineers, with very little value addition in terms of thinking and problem solving ability.
Besides, getting an engineering degree has become a default course of action in many instances, rather than a thoughtful decision, as it should be.
The students are frequently propelled into an engineering career by peer pressure, family pressure and poor guidance in high school. I have known several instances where the decision is made for the student by family and friends! If there are reliable statistics on the demand-supply situation for engineers in India, I have not seen them and it is certainly not widely known, making it extremely difficult for the student to make informed decisions.
Need for creative thinking
Creativity and original thinking are often acquired qualities and not necessarily inherent and they are certainly some of the most important qualities a good engineer must possess.
Creative thinking is rarely encouraged in our high school system of education, which encourages memorizing. I know of people, who are still able to recite text from our high school physics textbook, after so many years!! If schools and colleges do not take a creative, problem solving and numerical approach to teaching engineering, how is it reasonable to expect to produce quality engineers?
Disadvantage for rural based students
Very often, one finds that students from large cities and those who come from families with educated parents are able to find jobs a lot more easily than students from rural areas, mostly because of their communication abilities and not necessarily due to their technical superiority.
It is extremely unfortunate that the abilities, skills and consequently opportunities, should depend on the person’s family background!
It is the duty of the schools and colleges to devise methods to identify shortcomings and bridge such gaps. Time and resources will be better spent in doing this, rather than making policies on reservations, which only serve to increase tension and unrest in the society, not to mention, create shortcuts.
Lack of demand supply analysis
On the subject of traditional engineering courses such as Chemical and Civil engineering, while it is true that the number of seats are being reduced every year, it is also true that many of the existing engineers in core subjects like chemical engineering are also struggling to find relevant jobs and a lot of them end up in unrelated jobs. So, is it really necessary to increase the number of engineering seats and have more unemployed engineers?
Does anyone know (in the Dept. of education, Indian Institute of Engineers, AICTE or others), what is the current and projected demand for engineers in India? Unless a systematic demand-supply analysis is done, there is no way in the world to make the right decision on increasing or decreasing the number of seats.
I think management courses are receiving ample attention with every college, big and small, offering many courses. If we are not careful, there might come a time when we will have to rethink that as well.
However, it is true that many courses, particularly in the humanities are being largely ignored at the graduate level, probably because colleges do not take efforts to project them and glamorize them! Very few people go into humanities today out of genuine interest.
Accountability from the teachers
At the minimum, until the quality of teaching/ teachers is improved and efforts are made in schools and colleges to improve communication skills, India will continue to produce unemployable engineers. This should really not come as a surprise to anyone - it would only be a natural consequence of the system.
Better accountability from teachers is extremely important. To improve accountability, one of the things they do in the universities in USA is to request teaching evaluations from students at the end of every course, as a matter of routine. Based on these evaluations, there have been instances where teachers
with inadequate abilities have been barred from teaching the course any further and replacements are found. I think Dr. Radhakrishnan, the former President of India suggested similar things a long time back.
If the system of education continues as it is, we will merely be “mass producing” engineers, at best.
|